> Then general SV opinion through AFIK the general opinion I have heard outside of SV by people working with AI is that Altman is the one who had been acting "

> Then general SV opinion through AFIK the general opinion I have heard outside of SV by people working with AI is that Altman is the one who had been acting "dishonest, manipulative" in a way which endangers open ai (not OpenAI but AI which is open) in recent times and lets be honest SV isn't really known for caring about morals and bad consequences their tech can have, but the non-profit which made the decision has roughly committed to upholding such standards > that basically the board is screwed unless I highly doubt this, probably his comments (some of which where very misleading and manipulative i.e. not candid at all AFIK) in front of congress in context with the goals of the (non profit parent of) OpenAI which fired him has committed to would be enough reason to fire him. If we used similar manipulative speech also in board meetings this would be a pretty clear open and shut case in favor of the board which also would thoroughly destroy his reputation (iff that is the case and it's brought in front of court) so from an outsider perspective this would be a very interesting case.