4 ms·
The problem here is: Who watches the watchers? To my eyes, and to many others, it appears the board is power-tripping. Also, OpenAI's unique structure means th
by deeviant 3y ago
The problem here is: Who watches the watchers?
To my eyes, and to many others, it appears the board is power-tripping. Also, OpenAI's unique structure means they have no checks on the board that an investor class would normally give.
It's difficult to envision a thriving future for OpenAI under these circumstances or a world in which they are a significant factor in AI policy. Their early market lead, still a considerable advantage, will not be sufficient to weather the storm brewed by the board's own actions. Losing their market leverage would mean ceding the influential role in shaping AI's future, potentially leaving the giants such as Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and others assuming control and steering the future course of AI, but without the creed to make AI "good."
- jaybrendansmith 3y agoPut another way, as seen on X: "The AI industry would like to thank the board of OpenAI for giving all of us a chance to catch up"
- mmcwilliams 3y agoIn a legal sense the people who watch the board members of charities are the IRS and the state regulators in the jurisdiction it's established.