3 ms·
https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adk1633 https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adk1633
by bobmaxup 3y ago
https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adk1633 https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adk1633
- passwordoops 3y agoThanks for the full link, but kind of proves the point. We're just months removed from Science publishing room temp superconductivity... One paper tells other researchers to check it out. Doesn't mean it's: - reproducible - scalable - functional in the real world
- bawolff 3y agoThat's an unreasonable standard. Things can be interesting without them being a full-blown rolled out product.
- passwordoops 3y agoThen I'm afraid you don't understand how science works