3 ms·
Well, that's... like... your opinion, man. But not supported by etymology. "Quest" and "question" are also not a valid comparison, because the two forms aren't
by ShadowBanThis01 3y ago
Well, that's... like... your opinion, man. But not supported by etymology.
"Quest" and "question" are also not a valid comparison, because the two forms aren't even clearly the same word. For example, if someone goes on a quest through the jungle, you don't say "his question through the jungle was interrupted by a phone call from home." Or, "he questioned from one end of the jungle to the other."
- Skeime 3y agoBut quest and question have the same etymology, just like transit and transition. Having the same etymology clearly does not mean that the words cannot diverge in meaning. And if you looked up transit and transition in a dictionary, you’d find that they’re considered distinct in meaning, much along the lines of what I wrote.
- ShadowBanThis01 3y agoWhich dictionary? And quest/question are not parallel to transit/transition. If you think otherwise, please provide an example.
- Skeime 3y agoMerriam-Webster, OED, Wiktionary. (If you have a preferred dictionary not on the list, I’m sure you can look there yourself.) All of them have some variant of “to pass through” as the primary meaning of to transit and “to change from one state, place, etc. to another” as the meaning of to transition. And I didn’t claim that quest and question had a similar relation as transit and transition in meaning, only that in both cases, the two words have the same etymological root. I mentioned this in reference to your claim that my opinion was not supported by etymology. It doesn’t have to be, because etymology doesn’t dictate the current meaning of a word, it can just try to explain it.