3 ms·
> PEOPLE DIDN'T THINK THEIR 60'S - 90'S CODE WOULD STILL BE RUNNING IN 2000. That serves as evidence against this point, though: > COBOL in 60s was written wi
by trealira 3y ago
> PEOPLE DIDN'T THINK THEIR 60'S - 90'S CODE WOULD STILL BE RUNNING IN 2000.
That serves as evidence against this point, though:
> COBOL in 60s was written with a lot more focus on lasting in general.
- cwbriscoe 3y agoYeah, that point is wrong in my opinion. I don't think programmers back then tried to build things to last any more than programmers today do.