I feel like the only way they could ever palpably "prove" AGI/superiority is if they made ChatGPT CEO and/or maybe a board member but fortified against suggesti

I feel like the only way they could ever palpably "prove" AGI/superiority is if they made ChatGPT CEO and/or maybe a board member but fortified against suggestive redirection Edit: where would the line between conflict of interest and proving itself/concept fall out of curiosity. Is there any way for that to comport with their fiduciary responsibillities even if it is provably superior at the PKIs (if CEOS even have that outside of profit/loss etc)