This. Especially with NASA. The more infrequently you launch the more the expectation is that there are no failures so the more time you take to avoid failur

This. Especially with NASA. The more infrequently you launch the more the expectation is that there are no failures so the more time you take to avoid failures and so it recurses into launching SLS once every year and half or taking 10 years to launch J. Webb. I understand a lot of it is politics and government spending but it would be nice if NASA could get a case of go fever every once in awhile. So long as humans aren't involved. I understand if there were more failures there'd be less money for big projects -but I think we should take the chance to see if that money would end up being spent on more smaller quicker projects.