3 ms·
Because everybody is afraid they will cut access to the API now (saying "we need to focus on research rather than business"). And since they are the only ones c
by dvfjsdhgfv 3y ago
Because everybody is afraid they will cut access to the API now (saying "we need to focus on research rather than business"). And since they are the only ones controlling the access to the API, (1) people depending on it are screwed, (2) the competition like Claude will have a big boost.
- alchemist1e9 3y agoThat was also my first reaction. I worry those who are being disrupted found a way to take drastic action to interrupt the progress. Sadly that has me hoping personal or professional misconduct is behind it, he does give me a bad vibe, but that could be easily internal bias and bad stereotyping on my part. If it is revealed to be from an interference or slow down the progress the only silver lining is perhaps this gives open source projects some space to try and catch up.
- Schwabeus 3y agoWhy would they even consider doing such a thing? Lmfao that seems unfathomable, there are so many business applications dependent on API access right now it's like they're too big to fail, how would this even go down?
- dvfjsdhgfv 3y ago> that seems unfathomable Of course, I feel the same way. But I would have reacted the same way if someone had told me yesterday that sama would be fired - that seemed utterly ridiculous for so many reasons. And that's the point.