4 ms·
OK, I was part of those that thought that Altman did something wrong and the board was trying to do some damage control, but it actually seems that the board is
by jurgenaut23 3y ago
OK, I was part of those that thought that Altman did something wrong and the board was trying to do some damage control, but it actually seems that the board is simply out of their mind. This was _indeed_ another possibility, but seemed much less likely, given Altman's slightly megalomania-tainted personality.
I think the board just signed their own resignation, but didn't realize it yet. Microsoft didn't pay 10 billion dollars for nice RL benchmarks and a better H-index. They are after GPT-x's capabilities to infuse them across their entire portfolio. I predict they will find a way to align OpenAI back on their interest (i.e. $$$), and that probably means bringing back Altman, Brockman and other leading engineer at the expense of the board that fired them in the first place.
Of course, the board might refuse, but Microsoft could then pull out of the agreement, effectively causing OpenAI to go bankrupt. They would also be the first bidders if it were on sale ;-)
- true_religion 3y agoMicrosoft didnt pay for the boards company or else they would have a seat. The board is for the non profit which controls the for profit.
- LightMachine 3y agoSorry I'm not sure I understand what Microsoft could possibly do if the board just stays firm on their decision. The non-profit owns the majority of the for profit, and the board has full control over the non-profit. Right? So at best Microsoft could invest in whatever Sam does next, but their $10b is now under OpenAI's control and there is nothing they can do about it, no?