4 ms·
Your point hinged on billions in profit. Which you just made up, or assumed to be true for some reason. I don't think any of your points stand. Don't use fact y
by fugalfervor 3y ago
Your point hinged on billions in profit. Which you just made up, or assumed to be true for some reason. I don't think any of your points stand. Don't use fact you haven't checked as preconditions for points you want to make.
- jdthedisciple 3y ago[flagged]
- ai-sample 3y agoTo think that "Non-Profit" means "Free" is pretty naive. There are operating costs to maintain millions of users. That doesn't mean they are trying to profit.
- jdthedisciple 3y agoExactly. So what's Sam's crime exactly, trying to cover the costs?
- fugalfervor 3y agoAgain, conjecture with no supporting evidence.
- jdthedisciple 3y agoNot sure what you're trying to say. Clearly, under Altman, OpenAI has been massively successful one way or another, correct? Now they boot him and claim moral superiority? Really?
- CPLX 3y agoI mean, as far as I know the guy hasn't written a single line of code.
- bee_rider 3y agoA non-profit doesn’t have to offer their services for free, they can cover their expenses. A profit driven company will often offer their services below cost in order to chase away the competition and capture users.
- jdthedisciple 3y agoRight. Which is why the board's accusations against Sam are a farce as far as we can tell.
- bee_rider 3y agoHave they gotten specific yet? Last I heard was the whole “not sufficiently candid” thing, which is really nebulous; hard to call it a farce really. It is a “to be continued.” I’m going to wait and see before I get too personally attached to any particular position.