4 ms·

Keet [1] doesn't suck. Fully encrypted, peer to peer. Bandwidth only limited by what the parties to the call have access to. [1] https://keet.io/ https://keet.

by oska 3y ago

Keet [1] doesn't suck. Fully encrypted, peer to peer. Bandwidth only limited by what the parties to the call have access to. [1] https://keet.io/ https://keet.io/

chrisandchris 3y ago
> [...] Fully encrypted, peer to peer. [...] The least two features the average user wants. Most users are happy if sound and video work instantly, always. Maybe some marketing department should focus on that? (Don't know keet; yes, encryption is still an important festure).
- oska 3y ago
  Peer to peer makes it as fast as possible because it's not having to pass through a 3rd party's servers (which, for cost reasons, normally limit the bandwidth of the communication channel they are serving). This is just like when you pull down a torrent. You can do it as fast as your bandwidth and the bandwidth of the peers who are seeding it to you allow. Which can be blazingly fast.
  - FabHK 3y ago
    Then market it as "fast". Nobody (except a few zealots) cares about the implementation details.
    - oska 3y ago
      I'm not marketing it (I'm a user, not a developer). And I would think that HN is exactly the forum where ppl care about the implementation details.