3 ms·
No, we are not close to AGI. And AGIs can't leave machines yet, so humans will still be humans. This paranoia about a parroting machine is unwarranted.
by csomar 3y ago
No, we are not close to AGI. And AGIs can't leave machines yet, so humans will still be humans. This paranoia about a parroting machine is unwarranted.
- aidaman 3y agoyou're right. agi has been here since GPT-3 at the least. it's honestly sad when people who have clearly not use gpt4 would call it a parroting machine. that is incredibly ignorant.
- ric2b 3y agoLet me know when GPT can even play chess without making invalid moves, then we can talk about how capable it is of logical thinking.
- klibertp 3y agoLet me know when you can prove that "logical" and "intelligent" were ever stored on the same shelf, much less being meaningfully equivalent. If anything, we know that making a general intelligence (the only natural example of it we know) emulate logic is crazily inefficient and susceptive to biases that are entirely non-existent (save for bugs) in much simpler (and energy-efficient) implementations of said logic.
- ric2b 3y agoAn AGI that can't even play a game of chess, a game that children learn to play, without making an invalid move doesn't really sound like an AGI.