Sure, to quote from the article: "Cool looking nonsense, but nonsense." There was also this in the article: "Over at Pasts Imperfect, University of Iowa profe

Sure, to quote from the article: "Cool looking nonsense, but nonsense." There was also this in the article: "Over at Pasts Imperfect, University of Iowa professor Sarah Bond has an interesting piece on incorporating AI into her assignments by having students fact-check the results ChatGPT spits out at them. I think that’s a useful response for a certain kind of assignment and know of others who have done the same; I don’t think that makes ChatGPT useful, but I think it is a good approach for assignments otherwise vulnerable to ChatGPT as a method of limiting harm. Put another way: it is a good assignment for what I am still unconvinced is a good technology." I understand her pedagogical motivation, but then again, the free labor argument.