3 ms·
Not really. Turing test was beaten by much simpler chat bots and long before than ChatGPT (which isn't A(G)I).
by lamp987 3y ago
Not really. Turing test was beaten by much simpler chat bots and long before than ChatGPT (which isn't A(G)I).
- lostmsu 3y agoIt really was not, or link to the "beating" result.
- Jensson 3y agoIt was in 2014. https://www.vice.com/en/article/gvyy5m/how-a-computer-beat-the-turing-test-by-pretending-to-be-a-13-year-old-boy https://www.vice.com/en/article/gvyy5m/how-a-computer-beat-t... The turing test is a shit test for general intelligence, you can game it by making the AI generate a story that is more engaging than a typical boring human would do. Those stories will get much more human votes than a regular human. Some will go off track and notice it is a dumb program, but those are the minority so on average this dumb bot will pass the turing test.
- lostmsu 3y agoThis was a severely constrained version with limited public record, so paint me skeptical. For instance there was a 5 minute limit. From the article: Simultaneous tests as specified by Alan Turing Each judge was involved in five parallel tests - so 10 conversations 30 judges took part In total 300 conversations In each five minutes a judge was communicating with both a human and a machine Each of the five machines took part in 30 tests To ensure accuracy of results, Test was independently adjudicated by Professor John Barnden, University of Birmingham, formerly head of British AI Society 5 tests in 5 minutes that's just 1 minute each. In 1 minute it would be challenging to figure out you're not talking to ELIZA.