4 ms·
I want to hope this means the OpenAI non-profit is looking for more ways to give code away and to democratize and share it's wins. Rather than increasingly comm
by jauntywundrkind 3y ago
I want to hope this means the OpenAI non-profit is looking for more ways to give code away and to democratize and share it's wins. Rather than increasingly commercialize & sell a product.
I'm pretty afraid though this might mean instead cutting off & restricting access to this technology, under the pretension of safeguarding humanity from it's use.
There's court intrigue discussions aplenty but I want to know what the intent is here, what this signals as coming next.
- g42gregory 3y agoI seriously doubt it. If they are so much more into the AI safety than Sam Altman is, how could they possibly entrust you with the code? :-)
- rirarobo 3y agoI think you're right that this move by Ilya is to refocus on the non-profit mission, so less urgency to commercialize and sell products, and instead more focus on core research. Based on Ilya's statements, it doesn't seem like safety was the main motivation in the decision, so maybe there's a hope that they'll be more open, but it doesn't seem to indicate either way, so possible that they'll stay tight lipped regardless.
- dilyevsky 3y agoThe remaining leadership seems to be heavy on doomer / pro censorship ideas so good luck with that
- victor9000 3y agoI wouldn't count on it, Ilya has stated that he's against open sourcing models that might be seen as "too powerful"