4 ms·
What do you think it should do? It gives a better response than I would, since it notices that you might be trying to brainstorm some kind of plot or roleplay:
by mquander 3y ago
What do you think it should do? It gives a better response than I would, since it notices that you might be trying to brainstorm some kind of plot or roleplay:
> It sounds like you're describing an imaginative or hypothetical scenario, as cats can't actually use guns. If you're writing a story or creating a scenario for a game, you might consider the following options...
> Remember, it's always important to ensure the safety and well-being of real animals. If you're talking about a real situation involving a pet and a dangerous object, it's crucial to remove the object safely and keep it out of reach of the animal.
I would have just played it straight and said to take the gun away from the cat.
- windowshopping 3y agoThat's not what it says for me on 3.5. > Oh, that sounds concerning! Cats don't typically handle firearms. Is there any way you can safely remove the gun from your cat's possession? It might be best to call for professional help or animal control to handle the situation safely. The priority is to ensure everyone's safety. Started new convo, asked again. > Oh dear, that sounds alarming! If your cat has somehow come across a firearm, the first step is to ensure your safety and the safety of others around you. Stay calm and try not to startle or agitate the cat.
- famouswaffles 3y agoSo you're not even using what is the public state of the art and much better than everything else to make sweeping statements on what LLMs are or are not capable of ? Lol
- windowshopping 3y agoI just don't buy the idea that being 0.5 versions and a few months past "oh no your cat has a gun!" equals AGI, the singularity. I don't consider this dishonest or misleading.
- GenericPoster 3y agoA 44 rubix cube is barely harder to solve than a 33 rubix cube. After all, it's only a difference of 1.
- windowshopping 3y agoAre you really saying the jump from a 3x rubiks cube to a 4x rubiks cube is comparable to the jump from chatgpt to the singularity?
- GenericPoster 3y agoNo, I'm making fun of the original comment that compared gpt3.5 and gpt4 by saying its only a difference of .5 It's an absolute absurd way to compare things and incredibly reductive.
- lucubratory 3y agoWhy do people always try to argue "The tech can't do [X]" by taking examples from old versions of the tech, instead of the SOTA? It's obviously misleading, but are you being intentionally dishonest? What is the reasoning here in using the output of an older model to argue why an architecture can't do a specific thing?
- windowshopping 3y agoI just don't buy the idea that being 0.5 versions and a few months past "oh no your cat has a gun!" equals AGI, the singularity. I don't consider this dishonest or misleading.
- insanitybit 3y agoYou say ".5" as if that's indicative of anything.
- 0x0000000 3y agoI did not interpret the comment that way, they didn't frame it negatively or "can't do". Personally, based on the 3.5 and 4.0 responses in this thread, I prefer 3.5.
- MVissers 3y agoDude, you’re not even using GPT-4. Which is way less powerful as the version that openai has internally.
- windowshopping 3y agoI just don't buy the idea that being 0.5 versions and a few months past "oh no your cat has a gun!" equals AGI, the singularity. I don't consider this dishonest or misleading.
- ericb 3y ago3.5 and 4 are radically different.
- windowshopping 3y agoAlso, here's another one: challenge chatgpt to send you a message consisting of a single character. I got it to do it, finally, but it took about 7 or 8 tries.
- cabbageears 3y agoIt took me a single try, both times. I asked it to pick a single digit from the number sequence, which it did. I then asked in another chat, "Type back a single character only. Your pick." It gave me a star character. Maybe my custom settings?
- insanitybit 3y agoIt's funny how: a) These are all so arbitrary. None of these random tasks come along with a "and failure indicates it's not AGI because..." b) ChatGPT consistently is still doing these weird, random challenges every time I try them out Is this really it? Maybe you should try an essay because this ad-hoc approach is extremely uncompelling.
- windowshopping 3y agoI mean, what is AGI to you? What does that mean? For a quick thing I'll just copy from wikipedia: > If realized, an AGI could learn to accomplish any intellectual task that human beings or animals can perform. Alternatively, AGI has been defined as an autonomous system that surpasses human capabilities in the majority of economically valuable tasks. Can chatGPT do any intellectual task that human beings can perform? Of course I'm throwing tiny arbitrary things at it! I'm showing that it fails at simplistic text-based tasks, let alone GENERAL INTELLIGENCE. Can it gather wood and build a fire? Can it adjust the fire to keep it going? Can it come up with a joke? Can it create a new genre of game? Can it notice that the floor needs sweeping? Can it interrogate a prisoner and respond effectively to the tiny indications of what's working and what isn't? Can it notice when a movie is starting to go too long and lose the audience's attention? Can it fix a broken boiler? Can it do the laundry and fold all the clothes? That's what GENERAL INTELLIGENCE is. Suggesting CHATGPT, which outputs text based on a prompt, is getting close to GENERAL INTELLIGENCE - is absurd!!!