3 ms·
Could that not change as the board changes?
by j45 3y ago
Could that not change as the board changes?
- jprete 3y agoI think the board is required to be a majority non-equity-holders precisely because an equity-holding board will not keep to their non-profit mission.
- j45 3y agoSince it's a private non-profit corp it might be whatever they want the rules to be. Arms-length neutrality on a board in silicon valley might still work like the rest as other comments have stated. Maybe someone can shed some light on it
- jprete 3y agoI’m presuming it was put into place as part of creating the capped-for-profit entity, to make sure the for-profit couldn’t itself permanently misalign the non-profit’s board.