4 ms·
It would be interesting to see how this performs, compared to running Lucene, Solr, Sphinx, or what-have-you on an EC2 instance with equal resources.
by cbg0 15y ago
It would be interesting to see how this performs, compared to running Lucene, Solr, Sphinx, or what-have-you on an EC2 instance with equal resources.
- mryan 15y agoThis could replace SOLR for one of my sites - I'll need to do some benchmarks to compare them when deciding if it makes sense to move. If so, I can probably post CloudSearch:SOLR comparisons at least.
- huoju 15y agoLucene and Solr eat too many memory, they are not fit to vps users. Cloudsearch is more cheaper than setup a delicate server for search.
- Ecio78 15y agoit seems that the latest Solr 3.5.0. release use less memory: Bug fixes and improvements from Apache Lucene 3.5.0, including a very substantial (3-5X) RAM reduction required to hold the terms index on opening an IndexReader http://lucene.apache.org/solr/solrnews.html http://lucene.apache.org/solr/solrnews.html
- karmi 15y agoRunning ElasticSearch on AWS is pretty easy, see http://www.elasticsearch.org/tutorials/2012/03/21/deploying-elasticsearch-with-chef-solo.html http://www.elasticsearch.org/tutorials/2012/03/21/deploying-...