FWIW it is simpler because BUSL source can change to any license (including copyleft), whereas FSL can only change into MIT or Apache 2.0. So it goes from N pos

FWIW it is simpler because BUSL source can change to any license (including copyleft), whereas FSL can only change into MIT or Apache 2.0. So it goes from N possibilities to 2. > Is there any functional difference between apache and MIT? Apache 2.0 has an explicit patents clause, whereas MIT does not. Better explanation here: https://opensource.com/article/18/2/apache-2-patent-license https://opensource.com/article/18/2/apache-2-patent-license