4 ms·
This doesn’t make sense to me. It assumes Schmidt has inside info on why Altman was fired.
by next_xibalba 3y ago
This doesn’t make sense to me. It assumes Schmidt has inside info on why Altman was fired.
- carlossouza 3y agoOf course he has. Why would he risk political capital by defending sama publicly if he didn’t know for sure he wouldn’t get burned by defending him?
- vkou 3y agoMaybe because it's not risking very much political capital. If he's wrong, and shuts up (rather than doubling down on it), nobody will remember what he said in two weeks. Hell, some prominent tech people are often loudly wrong, and loudly double down on their wrong-ness, and still end up losing very little of their political capital in the long run. Or maybe he's right. We don't know, we're all just reading tea leaves.
- hackerlight 3y agoIf he didn't know he wouldn't say anything. Why risk saying something when there's a very high chance that it's something like sexual misconduct or fraud.
- londons_explore 3y agoSchmidt knows nearly everyone. He will know the details.