Why would he write the article without an angle? He's in finance, and is probably short/looking to short TSLA. It's not sinister. Many people here dismissing

Why would he write the article without an angle? He's in finance, and is probably short/looking to short TSLA. It's not sinister. Many people here dismissing the article, that's totally fine. It's unsourced. Other people may have interest in the struggles. The fact that this vehicle was supposed to be in production by now is relevant. Why isn't it? >Also obviously the taxpayers aren't paying for this vehicle program somehow If Pepsi is getting any kind of subsidy, then yes, the tax payer is paying for it. This would be surprising to you?