Just read this interesting article[0] about Sam Altmann: > "We need another breakthrough. We can still push on large language models quite a lot, and we will d

Just read this interesting article[0] about Sam Altmann: > "We need another breakthrough. We can still push on large language models quite a lot, and we will do that," Altman said, noting that the peak of what LLMs can do is still far away. > But he said that "within reason," pushing hard with language models won't result in AGI. > "If superintelligence can't discover novel physics, I don't think it's a superintelligence. And teaching it to clone the behavior of humans and human text - I don't think that's going to get there," he said. "And so there's this question which has been debated in the field for a long time: what do we have to do in addition to a language model to make a system that can go discover new physics?" But now the board coincidentally fired him, as you can read in the current top post on the front page. 0. https://www.thestreet.com/technology/openai-ceo-sam-altman-says-that-chatgpt-is-not-the-way-to-superintelligence https://www.thestreet.com/technology/openai-ceo-sam-altman-s...