5 ms·
I feel the article is pretty clear that it is attempting to improve the BUSL. 1) It’s a license without any variable substitution (as the BUSL has). 2) It als
by bentlegen 3y ago
I feel the article is pretty clear that it is attempting to
improve the BUSL.
1) It’s a license without any variable substitution (as the BUSL has).
2) It also has a firm change date to Apache 2.0 or MIT after 2 years (the BUSL default is 4, but this is also variable).
The BUSL has seen significant adoption but has a host of problems outlined in the article. But if you believe software should be an OSI-approved-license-or-nothing, this may not interest you.