3 ms·
You mentioned there is a subset, but the subsets described is still a way to identify the group of people. You can try and twist language all you want, but the
by randomdata 3y ago
You mentioned there is a subset, but the subsets described is still a way to identify the group of people. You can try and twist language all you want, but there is no avoiding the fact that a corporation is just people. If people somehow magically disappeared, the corporate entity would disappear at the exact same time – it's the same thing.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> You mentioned there is a subset, but the subsets described is still a way to identify the group of people. A subset of the actions or interests, not a subset of the group of people (the latter would, indeed, be just a different group of people, but isn't what I said.) > If people somehow magically disappeared, the corporate entity would disappear at the exact same time – it's the same thing. No, its not the same thing. If North America disappeared, all the piles of dog feces in North America would also disappear, but the piles of dog feces are not the same thing as North America.
- randomdata 3y ago> A subset of the actions or interests Direction is the word you are struggling to find, but it is the direction of the group of people. You have not added anything drawing attention to this so-called subset. It changes nothing about the discussion. It's just silly wordplay to divert our attention from your grievous error at the onset.