The "name ends with s" rule is surprisingly permissive -- I'm surprised an organization that claims to work to protect the apostrophe would allow one to be stri

The "name ends with s" rule is surprisingly permissive -- I'm surprised an organization that claims to work to protect the apostrophe would allow one to be stripped of its due support 's'. And without an analogous rule for non-name nouns ending in 's', it's just needlessly inconsistent. Protect the apostrophe! Demand the rightful 's'!