2 ms·
Quoting another user from an adjacent topic[0]; I for myself believe in 1., it seems generative AI tools is slowly becoming popular as lesser substitute to huma
by numpad0 3y ago
Quoting another user from an adjacent topic[0]; I for myself believe in 1., it seems generative AI tools is slowly becoming popular as lesser substitute to human arts, wherever there has to be data but any noise will do. No one listened to low-effort Text-to-Speech content pre-AI, some did for high-effort TTS content, and in neither case it was because the quality of synthesis was bad or good.
> I think Max Tegmark said there's 3 main camps of people talking about AI:
> 1. The people who think AI won't really work (at least in some fundamental way - it might make some stochastic melody but it won't have any creative spark to it).
> 2. The people who think AI will be able to do everything better than humans (in every possible way, at least as far as a mere human can tell) and that this will be great.
> 3. The people who think AI will be able to do everything better than humans (in every possible way, at least as far as a mere human can tell) and that this will be terrible.
0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38289548 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38289548
- dralley 3y agoOption 1b) it will work "well enough", cheaply enough, that it replaces human interaction in a number of places despite making the experience worse.