3 ms·
> * It also doesn't disclaim the author from writing you a check out of the good will of their heart.* Nobody expects that. But people do reasonably expect a
by teddyh 3y ago
> * It also doesn't disclaim the author from writing you a check out of the good will of their heart.*
Nobody expects that. But people do reasonably expect a project to recieve updates, security fixes, and new releases.
- infamouscow 3y agoI'm not disagreeing with you, you're just wrong. It's not reasonable to expect a project to receive updates, security fixes, and new releases for software projects the author put on the Internet explicitly with a license saying it's warrantied for no purpose, both explicit and implicit.
- teddyh 3y agoI was going to present a fair rebuttal, but you’ve just convinced me that it’s unreasonable for you to expect any answer from me in this debate.
- infamouscow 3y agoThere's nothing to debate. Your starting point is to selectively ignore parts of the authors explicitly chosen license. It's sophistry.