> I think the issue here is that we don't have a system where being an OSS contributor is a sustainable career path. Why should it be? Most OSS authors get pai

> I think the issue here is that we don't have a system where being an OSS contributor is a sustainable career path. Why should it be? Most OSS authors get paid to work on their stuff by some company who wants it. If there's no one willing to hire you, then your software is not worth it. I don't mean this negatively. I have lots of open source projects that are not worth it. I have one that I've been hired to work on before, but am no longer working on it anymore