Perhaps luck is the wrong word to use. I think there is now a path that offers a degree of statistical certainty that the right thing will happen. People make

Perhaps luck is the wrong word to use. I think there is now a path that offers a degree of statistical certainty that the right thing will happen. People make errors as well. These systems are trained in terms of people the ways they exchange information. I am not seeking perfect. I am seeking reasonable & practical. A non-zero error rate is acceptable to me and my team. My number is 90% right now. I can tolerate a 10% failure rate on the happy path (I.e. cases we expressly intended for it to support). At this target, certain desired functions are not granted yet. Once we reach 99% on the happy path, we will probably consider granting it autonomy ~equivalent to a human employee. Malicious users are out of scope - we aren't serving public traffic. This is employees only and everything is logged and sent for manager review as appropriate.