Regulations adds costs because of added operations and red tape and the costs could only come from consumers in the long term. This would mean a proportion of p

Regulations adds costs because of added operations and red tape and the costs could only come from consumers in the long term. This would mean a proportion of poor can't afford them and become offline. So regulation should be used only when required. Now if this is the case where the regulation is required is upto debate but the fact is that FCC isn't correcting any of the things ISP are doing currently but only few things that ISP could do in the future which would hurt consumers. And so this only feels like a political decision as "net neutrality" is a good sounding term and government which forces big companies to provide it is good.