4 ms·
It also doesn't disclaim the author from writing you a check out of the good will of their heart. I genuinely don't understand what's so difficult to grasp her
by infamouscow 3y ago
It also doesn't disclaim the author from writing you a check out of the good will of their heart.
I genuinely don't understand what's so difficult to grasp here.
- teddyh 3y ago> * It also doesn't disclaim the author from writing you a check out of the good will of their heart.* Nobody expects that. But people do reasonably expect a project to recieve updates, security fixes, and new releases.
- infamouscow 3y agoI'm not disagreeing with you, you're just wrong. It's not reasonable to expect a project to receive updates, security fixes, and new releases for software projects the author put on the Internet explicitly with a license saying it's warrantied for no purpose, both explicit and implicit.
- teddyh 3y agoI was going to present a fair rebuttal, but you’ve just convinced me that it’s unreasonable for you to expect any answer from me in this debate.
- infamouscow 3y agoThere's nothing to debate. Your starting point is to selectively ignore parts of the authors explicitly chosen license. It's sophistry.