Why is there a different standard between the model and a human? From the perspective of the business, whether a model or human causes the error is immaterial.

Why is there a different standard between the model and a human? From the perspective of the business, whether a model or human causes the error is immaterial. > Any sane company in any sane industry would figure out why things are that bad, and fix it. The function of a thing is its consequences. So we have to conclude that the reason the model had a 90% error rate was to have a 90% error rate. It's aligned with business incentives to be so.