2 ms·
You and I are reading "SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION." very differently.
by growse 3y ago
You and I are reading "SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION." very differently.
- teddyh 3y agoAt best, that only covers bug fixes. And, as I said, bug fixes are usually implied to be available in future releases.
- andrewjl 3y ago> At best, that only covers bug fixes. And, as I said, bug fixes are usually implied to be available in future releases Can you explain how you got to that interpretation from that phrasing? > SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. And how is future development and / or support not covered under servicing of that clause?
- teddyh 3y agoFixing defects is a different activity from support and future development, no?
- andrewjl 3y agoWhy is that distinction important? Especially in light of the first sentence of the paragraph that sentence is embedded in. > THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW.