6 ms·
As the other commenter pointed out, that source is more absurd than your initial claim, but I didn't down vote your comment.
by closewith 3y ago
As the other commenter pointed out, that source is more absurd than your initial claim, but I didn't down vote your comment.
- pydry 3y agoHe threw shade on it but without a good reason as the reply to him points out. Rescaling existing production is exactly how to demonstrate whether the peaks and lulls of solar and wind would sufficiently line up in a 100% solar/wind/pumped storage/hydrogen storage grid. Real data > hypothesized data. What's absurd is the fossil fuel/nuclear lobby's "for public consumption" models that assume that the sun and wind both go out for 4 weeks at a time every winter and that the only way to store energy is with lithium batteries from 2012.