This essay cites a statement from Geoffrey Hinton and ignores the whole talk that he gave. I think he cited him from the talk "Two path to intelligence". In tha

This essay cites a statement from Geoffrey Hinton and ignores the whole talk that he gave. I think he cited him from the talk "Two path to intelligence". In that talk Geoffrey Hinton said the complete opposite of this article, nevertheless he frames him like he would support this "essay". It's just his opinion and nothing else. Also the paper about "stochastic parrots" is under great criticism and there are now papers that contradict their conclusions.