4 ms·
The previous poster made a decision to exclude based on the other party's actions, namely giving someone shit about the color of a text box.. lol Why would I w
by sonicanatidae 3y ago
The previous poster made a decision to exclude based on the other party's actions, namely giving someone shit about the color of a text box.. lol
Why would I want to burden myself with clowns like that?
I wear clothes because they are comfortable and look nice. I don't wear clothes because of the branding and those that are overly concerned about the branding, would be the same.
Edit: also, I'm now apparently the same ilk as racists, since I choose not to deal with idiots that worry about the color of text boxes. That's cool.
- jmull 3y ago> also, I'm now apparently the same ilk as racists Where is that claim made?
- sonicanatidae 3y agoRight here: "So it would be more like showing your objection to racism by expressing racist ideas or taking racist actions" This is stating that, for example, if you dislike racists and choose not to associate with them, you're acting like a racist. lol That's not racism...at all. It's not even bigotry. The choice is based on actions, not class, religion, color, etc.
- jmull 3y agoI don't think you're following the thread correctly. I guess re-read it, if you want to understand what is being said (probably a waste of time though).
- sonicanatidae 3y agoI love the non-rebuttal, followed by immediate dismissal. lol ok..
- jmull 3y agoYour response doesn’t address the content of the thread coherently. What else can I say? We need to actually be talking about the same things to have a discussion.