2 ms·
> and are not what users want Ohoho. I, as a user, want to see the content. The amount of times when the content is not available because for whatever reason
by justsomehnguy 3y ago
> and are not what users want
Ohoho.
I, as a user, want to see the content. The amount of times when the content is not available because for whatever reason JS/CDN/whatever didn't work is uncountable.
Hell, sometimes I get a blank page for the login page, which could be replaced with a three lines of HTLM form, but now it requires a ten web requests, wait for them to load and only then it renders something.
It's even more amusing if you look at Network tab of Devel Tools.
> but it’s simply not worth the extra effort and testing
Maybe you shouldn't made a simple page require tons of JS and CSS to show the content in the first place?
Maybe not everything should be a web _app_?
- joshstrange 3y agoAnd this gets back to point I’ve made here and elsewhere about talking past each other. Not everything has to be a web app but some things do and those things need (require) JS, end of story. Yes a blog frontend doesn’t need JS but we are talking about different things here I think.