4 ms·
This remains relevant today, as when a new SSD undergoes evaluation by a prominent website, the tests are typically limited to workloads for which the SSD is sp
by olavgg 3y ago
This remains relevant today, as when a new SSD undergoes evaluation by a prominent website, the tests are typically limited to workloads for which the SSD is specifically designed. If the benchmarks included synchronous write and write latency assessments, the results would present a markedly different narrative. There are SSDs in the market whose write speeds are comparable to those of traditional spinning hard drives.
Here is a barchart from some of the older Samsung SSD's
https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_06_2017/post-5591-0-77040600-1496968848.png https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_06_2017/post-5591-0...
https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_06_2017/post-5591-0-53256900-1496968849.png https://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_06_2017/post-5591-0...
- moffkalast 3y agoWell the Intel S3500 sells for about $340 while the EVO 750 goes for about $40 for the same 0.5 TB size. I guess you get what you pay for.
- justsomehnguy 3y agoIt's even worse now, because QLC. As soon as you deplete the SLC cache you are down to ~50MB/s