3 ms·
I find this the cover band analogy a bit unintuitive. Anyone who practices art will tell you arts are very technical (painting is, music is, magic probably is t
by spoiler 3y ago
I find this the cover band analogy a bit unintuitive. Anyone who practices art will tell you arts are very technical (painting is, music is, magic probably is too is).
Millions of artists have done similar subject studies; does that make everyone cover artists?
I don't know much about magic/illusions, but I would think that someone with enough technical understanding of the craft could apply the techniques originally
- lisper 3y agoThis is the thing that very few people understand about magic, including many aspiring magicians: there is a lot more to it than just "technical understanding". Magic is a performance art. It's a kind of acting. And you can be very good at the technical stuff and still be a terrible performer/actor. (Personally, I'm bad at both :-) Here is my favorite example. This is one of the greatest performances of all time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_KcQt0z-eE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_KcQt0z-eE It looks like total chaos, and most people seeing this performance for the first time think that Dani is a master of sleight of hand, and that this performance relies on extremely difficult technical moves. In fact it is exactly the opposite. The secret "moves" are very basic -- anyone can do them, and everything that happens is actually very carefully controlled. (Dani is also a master of slight-of-hand, but that's not what this act relies on.) This is not to say that what Dani is doing here is easy; it's not. Dani teaches a class on this one routine that lasts three hours, and there is never a dull moment (this is how I know what's going on -- I did not figure it out by myself). But it's not hard in the way that, say, juggling is hard, it's hard in the same way that good acting is hard. When it's done well it looks easy, and making it look easy is very, very hard.