3 ms·
No, you are asking why people should be allowed to seek happiness without a state or corporate entity using that as a method of control.
by bratbag 3y ago
No, you are asking why people should be allowed to seek happiness without a state or corporate entity using that as a method of control.
- squigz 3y agoWell no I'm not but I appreciate you telling me what I mean.
- bratbag 3y agoYes you are. The question you are asking is defined by the context of what you are replying to. Selectively choosing to only reply to one part of that, in an effort to change the context, in fact changes nothing. In this case 'deserves' was used in the context of someone deserving freedom from state interference.
- joenot443 3y agoWell why don’t you explain what you do mean, then?
- squigz 3y agoWhy don't you re-read what I wrote? I don't think it was a particularly difficult question to understand
- joenot443 3y agoI read it, I thought it was needlessly rhetorical and deliberately argumentative. Not at all constructive conversation, more of a reddit 'gotcha' than anything. In short, I don't think you're being very honest with your intentions, it's a bad look and I'm sure you can do better :)
- squigz 3y agoInteresting. I thought narrator's response was needlessly misogynistic - but I suppose it's easier to ignore that part of the argument and instead try to tell me what I really meant. I wonder if you can do better.