3 ms·
Linux Distros: When It Absolutely, Positively Has to Be Secure
- corbet 15y agoThe author thinks that SELinux is a distribution - it's not, it's a technology that can be enabled by any distribution. That pretty much blows the credibility of the whole thing as far as I'm concerned.
- viraptor 15y agoAlso, I guess at least mentioning the ideas from http://qubes-os.org/Home.html http://qubes-os.org/Home.html wouldn't hurt...
- sj4nz 15y agoThe end of the article does mention this: > SELinux is not its own distribution. It is a subsystem of plain-vanilla Linux. SELinux is included in all kinds of Linux distributions, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux, he said.
- bifrost 15y agoThey apparently didn't fact check or properly research this article because its got some things that are blatantly wrong... This article is also fairly old, any idea why it was posted?