No, I meant "he" as in the subject of your post - the filmaker. I find it a bit odd that you, I assume an adult, are saying things like "what he is doing isn't

No, I meant "he" as in the subject of your post - the filmaker. I find it a bit odd that you, I assume an adult, are saying things like "what he is doing isn't that spectacular" in regards to a nine year old boy. I don't get why you have so much cynicism toward a nine year old boy but it is not my place to challenge your view. Simply put, this boy is very creative; that it's relative to some arbitrary set standard threshold level of creativeness does NOT matter to me, I don't care - he's creative. As an adult, I feel it part of my responsibility, and part of the greatness of being a Good human being, to cultivate young minds. This is what I got from the film - I think it's great. I think this kid is great (again why does his greatness have to be relative to "other kid's greatness") and I think the filmaker put in a lot of work to create value for all involved. Beautiful story, it brightened up my day, I'm happy. =D