3 ms·
Absolutely, but I'd rather just have you read this paper on environmental justice laws in the nuclear industry. It will educate you a bit more. For the nuclear
by underseacables 3y ago
Absolutely, but I'd rather just have you read this paper on environmental justice laws in the nuclear industry. It will educate you a bit more.
For the nuclear energy industry, environmental justice considerations are relevant to every stage of the life cycle of nuclear energy.
https://www.bdlaw.com/publications/nuclear-energy-and-environmental-justice-in-the-biden-era/ https://www.bdlaw.com/publications/nuclear-energy-and-enviro...
- epistasis 3y agoBy changing the topic and pointing to an irrelevant article, I take it that the claim about lawsuits is recanted and that no, you don't know of a single lawsuit at all? That article has nothing at all to do with Vogtle or Summer, has zero concrete claims, and is at most speculation about how things might be different in the future, and how some vague approaches might be used to make sure the nuclear industry fits in to some hypothetical and similarly vague push for vague values. I find it very odd how nuclear advocates cannot provide evidence for their claims, and often change the point. Honestly, I find it kind of rude that you claim to be providing one thing but then provide something completely unrelated, and act as if you actually did have evidence for your claims. It's extremely damaging to discussion, why should I trust anything you say from here on out if you are so unreliable? It's a huge problem that I run into with nuclear advocates, creationists, and anti-vaxxers. There's dedication to the causes but no dedication to conversational norms or even the basic standards of honesty.