3 ms·
>An LLM can't tell the difference between fact and fiction, because it can't apply logic. Not true. They can differentiate it just fine. Of course being able t
by famouswaffles 3y ago
>An LLM can't tell the difference between fact and fiction, because it can't apply logic.
Not true. They can differentiate it just fine. Of course being able to tell the difference and being incentivized to communicate it are 2 different things.
GPT-4 logits calibration pre RLHF - https://imgur.com/a/3gYel9r https://imgur.com/a/3gYel9r
Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback - https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14975 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14975
Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words - https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14334 https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14334
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know - https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05221 https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05221
The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets - https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06824 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06824
- thomastjeffery 3y ago> Not true. They can differentiate it just fine. I'm not convinced. I think the reality has been lost in its presentation. It's always a human who makes the assertion of truthiness. The LLM does not make determinations or assertions: it only remembers them. When we "train" an LLM, we structure it along our intentions. It never restructures itself. It never acts.