11 ms·
Not much, this took decades to bear into fruition, it was only two years ago or so the biggest party was vehemently saying no to nuclear. Expensive winters and
by techpression 3y ago
Not much, this took decades to bear into fruition, it was only two years ago or so the biggest party was vehemently saying no to nuclear.
Expensive winters and the idea of green steel and the massive and likely unrecoverable expenses it brings requires massive amounts of power that just isn’t possible with any other means. If you want the green steel you need nuclear in Sweden, we just can’t put up tens of thousands of wind power plants to cover for stability and delivery.
- actionfromafar 3y agoWell, I think nuclear is needed, but green steel is uniquely suited for intermittent (read: wind) power.