Yep, I'm familiar with that, but licensing isn't what I'm concerned about (LGPL is pretty permissive as-is; this agreement was mostly relevant in the days of Tr

Yep, I'm familiar with that, but licensing isn't what I'm concerned about (LGPL is pretty permissive as-is; this agreement was mostly relevant in the days of Trolltech when Qt was GPL/commercial). My main concern is that, despite the open governance, to my knowledge the development and direction of Qt is still primarily driven by employees of Nokia. I'm sure Qt would still do a fine job of existing and evolving under the leadership of KDE contributors, but it would nevertheless be a major blow to the framework to see so much talent whisked away at this critical time.