4 ms·
I've never seen that one. I would say that his solution is to analyze it twice, once from your current view, one from a cynical one. Look at where you get chan
by RationalDino 3y ago
I've never seen that one.
I would say that his solution is to analyze it twice, once from your current view, one from a cynical one. Look at where you get changes. Those are places to look for possible errors in your current thinking.
I'll have to try that out and see what I think of it.
- 082349872349872 3y agoNote that https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38212906 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38212906 points out source attribution (the first S in STASM) has become much more difficult over the last 8 decades, and even in Linebarger's time it was "soon evident that the mere attribution of source is a job of high magnitude."