3 ms·
I think they are referring to jurisdiction to enforce any judgement against the actor, which is likely in a foreign state with no extradition agreement with the
by hiatus 3y ago
I think they are referring to jurisdiction to enforce any judgement against the actor, which is likely in a foreign state with no extradition agreement with the US.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> jurisdiction to enforce any judgement against the actor, which is likely in a foreign state with no extradition agreement with the US Justice has a long memory. A common theme, when new extradition agreements are struck, usually in the context of trade or security arrangements, is how to deal with the backlog of overdue enforcement.
- hiatus 3y agoI agree in general, but I won't hold my breath for any agreement to be made between the US and Russia, Iran, North Korea, or China in my lifetime.