> by the need to be seen to be doing something against perceived fraud by minorities which led to mass profiling and huge fall-out It was not only perceived f

> by the need to be seen to be doing something against perceived fraud by minorities which led to mass profiling and huge fall-out It was not only perceived fraud by minorities: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_childcare_benefits_scandal?#Emergence_of_fraudulent_childminding_agencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_childcare_benefits_scand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_childcare_benefits_scandal?#Bulgarian_migrant_fraud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_childcare_benefits_scand... Most practitioners can tell you that naive anti-crime initiatives often end up targeting minorities. In many Western countries, minorities are significantly over-represented in crime and jail statistics (compared to the general population). Is that ipso facto racism or racial profiling?