3 ms·
I havent read it, but Blindsight did a very good job of explaining LLMs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindsight_(Watts_novel) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bl
by intended 3y ago
I havent read it, but Blindsight did a very good job of explaining LLMs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindsight_(Watts_novel) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindsight_(Watts_novel)
I am saying that LLMs DONT process information, not the way people are implying.
The best I can suggest is to please try building with an LLM. Its very hard to explain the nuance, and I am not the only one struggling with it.
- naasking 3y agoI understand the nuance, I think you're just wrong. LLMs augmented with memory are Turing complete [1], so they do process information. This distinction you're trying to draw is a mirage. [1] https://pub.towardsai.net/llms-and-memory-is-definitely-all-you-need-google-shows-that-memory-augmented-llms-can-simulate-4432f9f7923a https://pub.towardsai.net/llms-and-memory-is-definitely-all-...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- robwwilliams 3y agoAugmented with memory and perhaps a bit more—-recursive control of their own attentional mechanisms.
- therealdrag0 3y agoYou gotta read it!